Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] inconsistent handling of "qemu64" CPU model

2016-10-15 Thread Divan Santana
> In your case, you should be able to use > > > qemu64 > > > > to get the same CPU model you'd get by default (if not, you may need to > also add ). > > Alternatively > > > qemu64 > > > > should work too (and it would be better in case you use i

Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] inconsistent handling of "qemu64" CPU model

2016-05-26 Thread Chris Friesen
On 05/26/2016 04:41 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: The qemu64 CPU model contains svm and thus libvirt will always consider it incompatible with any Intel CPUs (which have vmx instead of svm). On the other hand, QEMU by default ignores features that are missing in the host CPU and has no problem using

Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] inconsistent handling of "qemu64" CPU model

2016-05-26 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 23:13:24 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > If I don't specify a virtual CPU model, it appears to give me a "qemu64" CPU, > and /proc/cpuinfo in the guest instance looks something like this: > > processor 0 > vendor_id GenuineIntel > cpu family 6 > model 6 > model name

Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] inconsistent handling of "qemu64" CPU model

2016-05-26 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:13:24PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: [...] > However, if I explicitly specify a custom CPU model of "qemu64" the > instance refuses to boot and I get a log saying: [Not a direct answer to the exact issue you're facing, but a related issue that is being investigated pres