On 12/24/2009 07:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
My main concern about this patch is that I don't really understand why
the current fp exceptions, the current rounding mode or flush_to_zero
mode are stored in FP_STATUS. I think it would be better to have
dedicated variable(s) in the cpu state struct
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 08:48:22PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:06:20AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > On 12/24/2009 07:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >> My main concern about this patch is tha
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 08:48:22PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:06:20AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 12/24/2009 07:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> My main concern about this patch is that I don't really understand why
> >> the current fp exceptions, the curr
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:06:20AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/24/2009 07:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> My main concern about this patch is that I don't really understand why
>> the current fp exceptions, the current rounding mode or flush_to_zero
>> mode are stored in FP_STATUS. I th
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:09:09PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> This is a squashed version of the 3 or 4 incremental patches that I
> had sent out for implementing the alpha fpu instruction qualifiers.
>
>
First of all, this patch has a lot of coding style issues. I have
reported some of th
