On 04/01/2015 07:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/01/2015 10:11 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 04/01/2015 06:53 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
[...]
I noticed something weird. I cannot actually create an instance of
machine
or get a reference to current_machine in order
On 04/01/2015 10:11 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 04/01/2015 06:53 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> [...]
>>> I noticed something weird. I cannot actually create an instance of
>>> machine
>>> or get a reference to current_machine in order to query its properties!
>>>
On 04/01/2015 06:53 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
[...]
I noticed something weird. I cannot actually create an instance of machine
or get a reference to current_machine in order to query its properties!
It seems that util/qemu-config is used by qemu-img which obviously
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> On 04/01/2015 11:28 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
>>
>>> On 03/31/2015 05:21 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Commit 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6 removed the QemuOptDesc
elements from the
*desc* field of the *qemu_machine_o
On 04/01/2015 11:28 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
On 03/31/2015 05:21 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Commit 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6 removed the QemuOptDesc
elements from the
*desc* field of the *qemu_machine_opts *array defined in vl.c. Since applying
that
On 04/01/2015 12:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/04/2015 11:14, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
This + 'monkey-patch' may be a feasible solution for 2.4
Why monkey-patch and not just revert?
There are already several machine sub-types that have
their own options, some of the code I think
it was a
On 01/04/2015 11:14, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> This + 'monkey-patch' may be a feasible solution for 2.4
Why monkey-patch and not just revert?
Paolo
On 04/01/2015 12:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/04/2015 10:42, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The obvious way to return them is to put them right back in
qemu_machine_opts.desc[]. But then -machine rejects machine-specific
parameters.
Hack: monkey-patch them in after we're done parsing.
Cleane
On 01/04/2015 10:42, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The obvious way to return them is to put them right back in
> qemu_machine_opts.desc[]. But then -machine rejects machine-specific
> parameters.
>
> Hack: monkey-patch them in after we're done parsing.
>
> Cleaner: "empty desc[] means accept anyt
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 01/04/2015 08:54, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> This is the first object for which QemuOps are defined per
>> sub-type and are not global (if you don't take "object" under
>> consideration).
>
> We can return the same QemuOpts that were included before.
> Per-machine-type
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> On 03/31/2015 05:21 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> Commit 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6 removed the QemuOptDesc
>> elements from the
>> *desc* field of the *qemu_machine_opts *array defined in vl.c. Since
>> applying that patch to qemu
>> on my system, I can n
On 01/04/2015 10:06, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>
>> We can return the same QemuOpts that were included before.
>> Per-machine-type options are new and need not be covered by
>> query-command-line-options.
>
> OK, we have them under hw/core/machine.c as "base" machine properties.
> We still need a
On 04/01/2015 11:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/04/2015 08:54, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
This is the first object for which QemuOps are defined per
sub-type and are not global (if you don't take "object" under
consideration).
We can return the same QemuOpts that were included before.
Per-ma
On 01/04/2015 08:54, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> This is the first object for which QemuOps are defined per
> sub-type and are not global (if you don't take "object" under
> consideration).
We can return the same QemuOpts that were included before.
Per-machine-type options are new and need not be
On 03/31/2015 05:21 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Commit 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6 removed the QemuOptDesc
elements from the
*desc* field of the *qemu_machine_opts *array defined in vl.c. Since applying
that patch to qemu
on my system, I can not start a guest from libvirt when certain
Commit 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6 removed the QemuOptDesc
elements from the
*desc* field of the *qemu_machine_opts *array defined in vl.c. Since
applying that patch to qemu
on my system, I can not start a guest from libvirt when certain machine
options are configured
for the guest
16 matches
Mail list logo