On 12/1/07, Blue Swirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/07, TeLeMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blue Swirl-2 wrote:
On 11/28/07, TeLeMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dyngen_code() can generate more than CODE_GEN_MAX_SIZE bytes,
code_gen_buffer
can be overflowed. I hope this
On 12/1/07, TeLeMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blue Swirl-2 wrote:
On 11/28/07, TeLeMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dyngen_code() can generate more than CODE_GEN_MAX_SIZE bytes,
code_gen_buffer
can be overflowed. I hope this security bug will be fixed soon.
Thank you for the
Blue Swirl-2 wrote:
On 11/28/07, TeLeMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dyngen_code() can generate more than CODE_GEN_MAX_SIZE bytes,
code_gen_buffer
can be overflowed. I hope this security bug will be fixed soon.
Thank you for the analysis. It's true that cpu_gen_code does not pass
On 11/28/07, TeLeMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dyngen_code() can generate more than CODE_GEN_MAX_SIZE bytes, code_gen_buffer
can be overflowed. I hope this security bug will be fixed soon.
Thank you for the analysis. It's true that cpu_gen_code does not pass
CODE_GEN_MAX_SIZE (65536) on to
dyngen_code() can generate more than CODE_GEN_MAX_SIZE bytes, code_gen_buffer
can be overflowed. I hope this security bug will be fixed soon.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-security-bug-code_gen_buffer-can-be-overflowed-tf4886083.html#a13985284
Sent from the QEMU - Dev