On 2017/10/9 19:17, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Halil Pasic [mailto:pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 7:05 PM
>>
>> On 10/09/2017 11:22 AM, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>> The next patch refactors make sense to me,
>>> but why do we need
> -Original Message-
> From: Halil Pasic [mailto:pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 7:05 PM
>
> On 10/09/2017 11:22 AM, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > The next patch refactors make sense to me,
> > but why do we need to decouple the virtio-crypto.h?
> >
> >
>
> I
On 10/09/2017 11:22 AM, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> The next patch refactors make sense to me,
> but why do we need to decouple the virtio-crypto.h?
>
>
I wanted to be able to freely change the host side and test with an unchanged
guest side, that's why I've done that. It's just for testing. I
> -Original Message-
> From: Halil Pasic [mailto:pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 10:25 PM
> On 09/18/2017 03:17 AM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2017/9/16 1:33, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/14/2017 02:58 AM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
> >>>
>
On 09/18/2017 03:17 AM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/16 1:33, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 09/14/2017 02:58 AM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017/9/14 2:14, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
On 09/11/2017 03:10 AM, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> *NOTE*
> The code
On 2017/9/16 1:33, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 09/14/2017 02:58 AM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017/9/14 2:14, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/11/2017 03:10 AM, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
*NOTE*
The code realization is based on the latest virtio crypto spec:
[PATCH
