Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

For a somewhat complete alpha emulator, there's es40 on sourceforge. It doesn't actually boot an OS yet, but its getting closer. The firmware comes up and but it hangs on OS initialization. http://sourceforge.net/projects/es40/ Brian On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:57 +0200, J. Mayer wrote: > On

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:08 +0100, Stuart Brady wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:25:47PM +0200, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote: > > > About the Alphas, it would be great to run Tru64 on them or for the > > occasional OpenVMS session. I'm looking forward to implementing an > > Alpha target even tho

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:25:47PM +0200, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote: > About the Alphas, it would be great to run Tru64 on them or for the > occasional OpenVMS session. I'm looking forward to implementing an > Alpha target even though I've never seen or used them. You must be > very lucky to hav

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Thomas Orgis wrote: Sure, 32bit is vanishing from new hardware sales. You can hardly buy a 32-bit AMD chip anymore and I wouldn't buy a 32-bit Intel chip when you can get a 64-bit AMD for the same price or less. So for me, 32 bits are the state-of-the art, apart from my two machines at

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Am Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:56:59 -0400 schrieb Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 24 March 2007 8:32 am, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote: > > Anyhow, I expect 32-bit hardware to gradually die because of wear and > > tear in the next few years and the replacement will be 64-bit hardware so >

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

On Saturday 24 March 2007 8:32 am, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote: > Anyhow, I expect 32-bit hardware to gradually die because of wear and > tear in the next few years and the replacement will be 64-bit hardware so > the problem will solve itself that way. Specifically, in 2008 32-bit x86 hardware b

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Am Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:55:16 + schrieb Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The problems of the gcc backend to qemu have already been discussed > extensively on this list. Stealing 3+ registers from gcc on x86 really > is asking for trouble, and I believe it is generally understood that the

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

> As far as X86 is concerned i386/i486/i586 are very different from later > generation > processors. I am wondering whether another host and target architecture > could be > created called i686 that makes use of something like MMX or other > registers in Intel > Pentium II/III/4 and AMD Athlon to

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Thomas Orgis wrote: Am Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:45:49 + schrieb Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I do not understand enough of QEMU yet, but I have checked out CVS and am reading through its source. When I understand more I hope we can fix this long-standing annoyance. This is GCC PR1

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Am Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:45:49 + schrieb Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I do not understand enough of QEMU yet, but I have checked out CVS and > > am reading through its source. When I understand more I hope we can fix > > this long-standing annoyance. > > This is GCC PR16185

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

> I do not understand enough of QEMU yet, but I have checked out CVS and > am reading through its source. When I understand more I hope we can fix > this long-standing annoyance. This is GCC PR16185 . There's no fundamental reason why some options trigger it, and others

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Thomas Orgis wrote: Am Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:13:00 +0100 schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I have seen this error as well when building with i686/pentium3/athlon optimisations. As I am doing a course on x86 assembly programming at the moment I can tell you that it suffers fro

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Am Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:13:00 +0100 schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have seen this error as well when building with i686/pentium3/athlon > optimisations. As I am doing a course on x86 assembly programming > at the moment I can tell you that it suffers from register starvatio

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Thomas Orgis wrote: Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:18:40 + schrieb Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The first part is true, the second is not, in that I already upgraded to the 686 kernel, so the qemu build on FC6 is not fixed by installing the 686 kernel. So, do we have any other clue

Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 and svn don't build with -march=pentium2 etc.; was: Latest SVN fails to build on Fedora Core 6 (same with 0.9.0)

Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:18:40 + schrieb Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The first part is true, the second is not, in that I already upgraded > to the 686 kernel, so the qemu build on FC6 is not fixed by installing the > 686 kernel. So, do we have any other clue about this? Some qemu code