On Friday 27 November 2009 05:17:32 Vincent Sanders wrote:
> I appear to be unable to take a hint, your silence on this patch in
> the past probably ought to have been a clue. however this will be the
> last time I bother to try and get anything merged so you wont have to
> be disturbed again.
>
>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 03:57:37 Filip Navara wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> > On Friday 27 November 2009 05:35:26 Filip Navara wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Sanders
>> >
>> > wro
On Sunday 29 November 2009 03:57:37 Filip Navara wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Friday 27 November 2009 05:35:26 Filip Navara wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Sanders
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > I appear to be unable to take a hint, your silence
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 27 November 2009 05:35:26 Filip Navara wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Sanders
> wrote:
>> > I appear to be unable to take a hint, your silence on this patch in
>> > the past probably ought to have been a clue. ho
On Friday 27 November 2009 05:35:26 Filip Navara wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Sanders
wrote:
> > I appear to be unable to take a hint, your silence on this patch in
> > the past probably ought to have been a clue. however this will be the
> > last time I bother to try and ge
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:17:32AM +, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> The affected instructions and program counter load behaviour are made
> CPU version dependant and the ARM920T cpu id is introduced.
It would be nice if qemu had an arm920t cpu selectin option because then
I could do some autom
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> I appear to be unable to take a hint, your silence on this patch in
> the past probably ought to have been a clue. however this will be the
> last time I bother to try and get anything merged so you wont have to
> be disturbed again.
>
> T
I appear to be unable to take a hint, your silence on this patch in
the past probably ought to have been a clue. however this will be the
last time I bother to try and get anything merged so you wont have to
be disturbed again.
The attached patch adds V4t support to the ARM emulation, its pretty
m
