On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:52:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John R. Hogerhuis
I can't say. But even if it were, I'd guess most here would rather work
under Unix-like OS.
Undoubtably.
The Linux builders outnumber the Win builders by probably 50 to one. If not
more.
I
Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
feedback would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Tim
Tim Walker wrote:
How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build
environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image?
you would probably need to setup cross compilers at least,
find a global linux config file generic enough (ex: no framebuffer),
and at least a initrd with minimum bins (static busybox would be
best).
This also implies you've a lot of time free :) if you want to do it for
many
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:19 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
feedback would be appreciated.
It's a cool idea, I think. I went through the mingw thing a while back
and it's a PITA. It would be nice to have known working build
BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
untrue.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/default.mspx
Christian MICHON
untrue.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/default.mspx
that would give 6 months to complete development...
I think they did one of them for a year.
However, I doubt they'd appreciate you distributing anything of theirs...
Can ReactOS be used to host
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John R. Hogerhuis
BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
John R. Hogerhuis
I can't say. But even if it were, I'd guess most here would rather work
under Unix-like OS.
Undoubtably.
The Linux builders outnumber the Win builders by probably 50 to one. If not
more.
But I know from the effort I went through to get qemu to build under windows
that
Thanks for the replies.
I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
tradeoff would be speed for x86 users vs ease of image
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 22:30 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
10 matches
Mail list logo
