On 01/26/2016 04:20 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Li Zhijian (lizhij...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
On 01/25/2016 09:32 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
f) I've not thought about the colo-proxy that much yet - I guess that
existing connections need to keep their sequence number offset bu
On 01/26/2016 02:59 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Wen Congyang (we...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> On 01/23/2016 03:35 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I've been looking at what's needed to add a new secondary after
>>> a primary failed; from the block side it doesn't look as ha
* Li Zhijian (lizhij...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 01/25/2016 09:32 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >>>f) I've not thought about the colo-proxy that much yet - I guess that
> >>> existing connections need to keep their sequence number offset but
>
> Strictly speakingļ¼ after failover, we
* Wen Congyang (we...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 03:35 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've been looking at what's needed to add a new secondary after
> > a primary failed; from the block side it doesn't look as hard
> > as I'd expected, perhaps you can tell me if I'm mi
On 01/25/2016 09:32 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>f) I've not thought about the colo-proxy that much yet - I guess that
> existing connections need to keep their sequence number offset but
Strictly speakingļ¼ after failover, we only need to keep servicing for the tcp
connections which ar
On 01/23/2016 03:35 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking at what's needed to add a new secondary after
> a primary failed; from the block side it doesn't look as hard
> as I'd expected, perhaps you can tell me if I'm missing something!
>
> The normal primary setup is:
>
>
Hi,
I've been looking at what's needed to add a new secondary after
a primary failed; from the block side it doesn't look as hard
as I'd expected, perhaps you can tell me if I'm missing something!
The normal primary setup is:
quorum
Real disk
nbd client
The normal secondary setu
