2018-01-18 18:49 GMT+08:00 Daniel P. Berrange :
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:38:57PM +0800, Li Qiang wrote:
> > Hi Paolo, all,
> >
> > I have a question about the intel microcode update for spectre variant#2.
> > From my understanding, there is no need to update the microcode of VMs
> > because th
On 18/01/2018 11:48, Li Qiang wrote:
>
> > But upon I update the centos guest, the host kvm/qemu has been updated.
> > The IBPB_ENABLED and IBRS_ENABLED are both zero if I don't update the
> > microcode in the guest. If I update the guest micorcode, the are both 1.
>
> What do you
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:38:57PM +0800, Li Qiang wrote:
> Hi Paolo, all,
>
> I have a question about the intel microcode update for spectre variant#2.
> From my understanding, there is no need to update the microcode of VMs
> because the kvm has expose the SPEC_CTL and PRED_CMD to the guest.
> A
2018-01-18 18:43 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini :
> On 18/01/2018 11:38, Li Qiang wrote:
> > Hi Paolo, all,
> >
> > I have a question about the intel microcode update for spectre variant#2.
> > From my understanding, there is no need to update the microcode of VMs
> > because the kvm has expose the SPEC_
On 18/01/2018 11:38, Li Qiang wrote:
> Hi Paolo, all,
>
> I have a question about the intel microcode update for spectre variant#2.
> From my understanding, there is no need to update the microcode of VMs
> because the kvm has expose the SPEC_CTL and PRED_CMD to the guest.
> Also, if we need to up
Hi Paolo, all,
I have a question about the intel microcode update for spectre variant#2.
>From my understanding, there is no need to update the microcode of VMs
because the kvm has expose the SPEC_CTL and PRED_CMD to the guest.
Also, if we need to update the micorcode in guest, who is the vendor f
