On 2017-11-07 06:21, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 11/06 19:49, Max Reitz wrote:
[...]
>> I have two ideas:
>>
>> One is to assume that (un-)draining a parent will always (un-)drain all
>> children, including the one the (un-)drain comes from. This assumption
>> seems wrong, see [1], but maybe it i
On Mon, 11/06 19:49, Max Reitz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On my quest to fix some flaky iotests, I came to a bit of a halt on 129.
> (Details: Its issue is that block jobs now generally ignore throttling
> in a BB (because they use their own), so we have to add a throttle node
> instead. However,
Hi everyone,
On my quest to fix some flaky iotests, I came to a bit of a halt on 129.
(Details: Its issue is that block jobs now generally ignore throttling
in a BB (because they use their own), so we have to add a throttle node
instead. However, when I added it, I got an abort.)
My issue can b
