On 5/3/19 3:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Ugh. Hole granularities are file-system specific, so we need to figure
>>> out some way to fuzz the input. It might also be possible to pick nicer
>>> size numbers - perhaps if the test image is sized at 64k+1 instead of
>>> 43009 (84*512, but NOT evenly di
On 5/2/19 11:43 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 03/05/2019 00.02, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 4/28/19 10:21 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> QEMU iotest 221 is failing for me, too, when I run it with -raw:
>>
>> Which filesystem?
>
> ext4 again.
>
> $ stat -f /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/
>
On 03/05/2019 00.02, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 4/28/19 10:21 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> QEMU iotest 221 is failing for me, too, when I run it with -raw:
>
> Which filesystem?
ext4 again.
$ stat -f /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/
File: "/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/"
On 4/28/19 10:21 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> QEMU iotest 221 is failing for me, too, when I run it with -raw:
Which filesystem?
>
> tests/qemu-iotests$ ./check -raw 221
> QEMU --
> "/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/../../x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64"
> -nodefaults -mach
QEMU iotest 221 is failing for me, too, when I run it with -raw:
tests/qemu-iotests$ ./check -raw 221
QEMU --
"/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/../../x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64"
-nodefaults -machine accel=qtest
QEMU_IMG -- "/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-
