On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:18:19PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 14:33 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > Apologies in advance for asking a possibly exorbitantly lame question...
> >
> > On 02/06/13 10:47, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 14:33 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Apologies in advance for asking a possibly exorbitantly lame question...
>
> On 02/06/13 10:47, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael To
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:33:28PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Apologies in advance for asking a possibly exorbitantly lame question...
>
> On 02/06/13 10:47, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Mic
Apologies in advance for asking a possibly exorbitantly lame question...
On 02/06/13 10:47, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> 05.02.2013 15:31, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:02:45PM +0200, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 13:33 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:53:39PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200,
On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 13:33 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:53:39PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vad
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 13:33 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:53:39PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:53:39PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> > > >
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >> On
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > >>
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:33 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> Is it really
> >> > that bad that the config space size changed? Why it ha
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:33:04AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> Is it really
> >> > that bad that the config space size changed? Wh
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> Maybe we should ask for some centrally assigned vendor id?
> We could ask IANA to keep the database.
Or we could make it the task of the virtio spec. I don't think it's
vital...
Cheers,
Rusty.
Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Is it really
>> > that bad that the config space size changed? Why it has this effect?
> Because in this case it's hard to distinguish bet
On 02/05/2013 11:49 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On 02/05/2013 09:58 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Vadim, can you please describe in a bit more details what the actual
issue
here is, from the windows or windows driver point of view? Is it really
that bad that the config space size change
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > 05.02.2013 15:31, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> > >On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 08:41 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >>Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> >
> > >>>http://msdn.microsof
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:33:41AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Anthony Liguori writes:
> > Rusty Russell writes:
> >> If I could find a way, I'd like to create some code as an appendix to
> >> the virtio spec which would torture test each driver and/or device by
> >> configuring it in strange w
Anthony Liguori writes:
> Rusty Russell writes:
>> If I could find a way, I'd like to create some code as an appendix to
>> the virtio spec which would torture test each driver and/or device by
>> configuring it in strange ways. But that's pure speculation at this
>> point.
>
> It wouldn't be so
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 05.02.2013 15:31, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 08:41 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
>
> >>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/gg463287.aspx
> >>
> >>That's a usef
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 08:41 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >> >
> >> virtio spec is very explicit that revision never changes:
> >> "
05.02.2013 15:31, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 08:41 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/gg463287.aspx
That's a useful link, thanks.
I don't see anything in that link that would strictly require us
Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>> >
>> virtio spec is very explicit that revision never changes:
>> "The device must also have a Revision ID of 0 to match this
>> specificat
Rusty Russell writes:
> Anthony Liguori writes:
>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>
>>> 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>>>
> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
> driver was making an assumption about an 8-byte config size, that's
> likely what the
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:09 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> Michael Tokarev writes:
> > >>
> >
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:09 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Michael Tokarev writes:
> >>
> >>> 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >>>
> > If it helps, mq c
On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:09 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>
>>> 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>>>
> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
> driver was making an assu
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:09:39PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Michael Tokarev writes:
> >>
> >> > 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>> If it helps, mq changes the con
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:30:47AM +1100, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:09 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Michael Tokarev writes:
> >
> > > 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> > >
> > >>> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
> > >>> driv
Anthony Liguori writes:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>
>> 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>>
If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
driver was making an assumption about an 8-byte config size, that's
likely what the problem is.
>>> That's exac
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:09 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>
> > 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >
> >>> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
> >>> driver was making an assumption about an 8-byte config size, that's
> >>> likely wh
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:09:39PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>
>> > 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>> >
>> >>> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
>> >>> driver was making an assumption about
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:09:39PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>
> > 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >
> >>> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
> >>> driver was making an assumption about an 8-byte config size, that's
> >>> li
Michael Tokarev writes:
> 03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>
>>> If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
>>> driver was making an assumption about an 8-byte config size, that's
>>> likely what the problem is.
>>>
>> That's exactly the problem.
>
> So what do we
03.02.2013 17:23, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
If it helps, mq changes the config size from 8 to 16 bytes. If the
driver was making an assumption about an 8-byte config size, that's
likely what the problem is.
That's exactly the problem.
So what do we do? It isn't nice to break existing setups.
M
On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
>
>> On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 20:42 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> Have a look at this issue. It was caused by multiqueue patch who adds a
>>> new field to virtio_net_cfg. Not sure multiqueue is the root cause since
>>
Vadim Rozenfeld writes:
> On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 20:42 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> Have a look at this issue. It was caused by multiqueue patch who adds a
>> new field to virtio_net_cfg. Not sure multiqueue is the root cause since
>> I also find even w/o multiqueue, adding any new field to vir
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 20:42 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 02/02/2013 05:13 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Michael Tokarev writes:
> >
> >> 02.02.2013 00:36, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>> Michael Tokarev writes:
> >>>
> 02.02.2013 00:18, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Just a heads-up for now,
On 02/02/2013 05:13 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>
>> 02.02.2013 00:36, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>>
02.02.2013 00:18, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Just a heads-up for now, no real diagnostics or anything like that.
>
> Current git ma
Michael Tokarev writes:
> 02.02.2013 00:36, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>
>>> 02.02.2013 00:18, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Just a heads-up for now, no real diagnostics or anything like that.
Current git master (a9c87c586ba9ee290792a98dc126b2861b7f8b03), when boo
02.02.2013 00:36, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael Tokarev writes:
02.02.2013 00:18, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Just a heads-up for now, no real diagnostics or anything like that.
Current git master (a9c87c586ba9ee290792a98dc126b2861b7f8b03), when booted
a windows guest, results in no virtio-net i
Michael Tokarev writes:
> 02.02.2013 00:18, Michael Tokarev пишет:
>> Just a heads-up for now, no real diagnostics or anything like that.
>>
>> Current git master (a9c87c586ba9ee290792a98dc126b2861b7f8b03), when booted
>> a windows guest, results in no virtio-net inside. Neither winXP nor Win7,
02.02.2013 00:18, Michael Tokarev пишет:
Just a heads-up for now, no real diagnostics or anything like that.
Current git master (a9c87c586ba9ee290792a98dc126b2861b7f8b03), when booted
a windows guest, results in no virtio-net inside. Neither winXP nor Win7,
neither older nor latest (22 Jan 2013
Just a heads-up for now, no real diagnostics or anything like that.
Current git master (a9c87c586ba9ee290792a98dc126b2861b7f8b03), when booted
a windows guest, results in no virtio-net inside. Neither winXP nor Win7,
neither older nor latest (22 Jan 2013) virtio-net drivers works.
Windows displ
43 matches
Mail list logo
