Hi list,
After a discussion on irc we have two potential solution in order to introduce
a new bs->node_name member in order to be able to manipulate the graph from the
monitors.
The first one is to make the QMP device parameter of the block commands optional
and add the node-name parameter as a
On Mon, 10/28 16:40, Benoît Canet wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> After a discussion on irc we have two potential solution in order to introduce
> a new bs->node_name member in order to be able to manipulate the graph from
> the
> monitors.
>
> The first one is to make the QMP device parameter of the b
[Note cc: Eric & Luiz, because this also relates to QMP]
Benoît Canet writes:
> Hi list,
>
> After a discussion on irc we have two potential solution in order to introduce
> a new bs->node_name member in order to be able to manipulate the graph from
> the
> monitors.
>
> The first one is to mak
On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
> then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or (for backward
> compatibility) to the root BDS by "device". When the code sees
> "device", it'll look up the BB, then fetc
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> >
> > The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
> > then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or (for backward
> > compatibility) to the root BDS by "devic
On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
> Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
>>> then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or (for
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:59:20 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
> > Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id".
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
> then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or (for backward
> compatibility) to the root BDS by "device". When the code sees
> "device", it'll look up the
On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or (for backward
compatibility) to the root BDS by "device". Whe
Am 04.11.2013 um 10:48 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
>
> On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >>The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
> >>then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or
Am 01.11.2013 um 16:12 hat Luiz Capitulino geschrieben:
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:59:20 -0600
> Eric Blake wrote:
>
> > On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
> > > Eric Blake wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
On 11/04/2013 07:06 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.11.2013 um 10:48 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id". Users can
then refer either
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:13:59 +0100
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 01.11.2013 um 16:12 hat Luiz Capitulino geschrieben:
> > On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:59:20 -0600
> > Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/01/2013 08:51 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
> > > > Eric Blake wrot
Le Monday 04 Nov 2013 à 19:33:21 (+0800), Fam Zheng a écrit :
>
> On 11/04/2013 07:06 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Am 04.11.2013 um 10:48 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> >>On 11/04/2013 05:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The firs
14 matches
Mail list logo