On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:03:26PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > That is not how he uses the terms. He uses them interchangably.
> B) The people I've seen care about this are embedded system developers, who
> also make a distinction between "emulator" and "simulator". (One is a
> hardware board
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 1:18 pm, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:48:33AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > Here you are using the terms "virtual" and "emulated" interchangably.
That's
> > > ok as long as the difference between virtualization and virtual/emulated
is
> > > underst
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:54:57AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 5:26 am, Joshua Root wrote:
> > Part of the generally accepted definition of virtualization is that the
> > majority of guest instructions execute directly on the real CPU with no
> > intervention by the VMM.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:48:33AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Here you are using the terms "virtual" and "emulated" interchangably. That's
> > ok as long as the difference between virtualization and virtual/emulated is
> > understood.
>
> Well, the hardware people see a huge difference. To th
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 5:26 am, Joshua Root wrote:
> Part of the generally accepted definition of virtualization is that the
> majority of guest instructions execute directly on the real CPU with no
> intervention by the VMM. QEMU + qvm86 does count as virtualization if
> the system spends most
On Monday 09 October 2006 8:08 am, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:05:02AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > qemu is primarily a dynamic translator not a virtualizer.
> >
> > That's an implementation detail. The end result is running programs in a
> > virtual environment, and qemu
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 08 October 2006 10:36 am, Jim C. Brown wrote:
>> qemu is primarily a dynamic translator not a virtualizer.
>
> That's an implementation detail. The end result is running programs in a
> virtual environment, and qemu's system emulation has lots of virtual hardware
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:05:02AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > qemu is primarily a dynamic translator not a virtualizer.
>
> That's an implementation detail. The end result is running programs in a
> virtual environment, and qemu's system emulation has lots of virtual hardware
> it attaches t
On Sunday 08 October 2006 10:36 am, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:30:19AM -0700, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > http://www.linuxworldexpo.de/linux_messe.php?ID=124&STEP=&lang=en
> >
> > I don't see Qemu mentioned at all. I wonder if any of the developers have
been contacted at all.
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:58:51PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Don't forget qvm86, which is intended as an open source drop-in
> replacement for kqemu.
>
> -- Jamie
>
One that, when I last checked, was outdated and unmaintained. (Though I
admit I haven't looked at qvm86 recently.)
--
Infinite
Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:30:19AM -0700, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > http://www.linuxworldexpo.de/linux_messe.php?ID=124&STEP=&lang=en
> >
> > I don't see Qemu mentioned at all. I wonder if any of the
> > developers have been contacted at all. I thing it is a pity that once
>
Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:30:19AM -0700, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>> http://www.linuxworldexpo.de/linux_messe.php?ID=124&STEP=&lang=en
>>
>> I don't see Qemu mentioned at all. I wonder if any of the developers have
>> been contacted at all. I thing it is a pity that once againg
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:30:19AM -0700, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> http://www.linuxworldexpo.de/linux_messe.php?ID=124&STEP=&lang=en
>
> I don't see Qemu mentioned at all. I wonder if any of the developers have
> been contacted at all. I thing it is a pity that once againg Qemu is ignored.
>
> Ot
http://www.linuxworldexpo.de/linux_messe.php?ID=124&STEP=&lang=en
I don't see Qemu mentioned at all. I wonder if any of the developers have been
contacted at all. I thing it is a pity that once againg Qemu is ignored.
Ottavio
___
Qemu-devel mailing
14 matches
Mail list logo