It seems this interesting patch:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-03/msg00041.html
hasn't been applied to CVS for some reason.
Has it been accidentally skipped or is it not applicable to CVS?
Best regards.
Miguel.
_
Hello,
I tried the cvs version from about a week ago with the latest kqemu driver, but
the network problem still exists. I am using:
qemu -net nic -net tap,ifname=my-tap
under Win2k with a Gentoo guest. The network throughput is about 20 MB ( per
Minute ! ).
When I use qemu 0.7.2 with the tap pa
Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:44 AM Helmut Auer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> Hello,
>> I just upgraded to qemu 0.8.0 including vlan/tap patch and I noticed that
the network speed is much slower than under 0.7.2 with tap patch ( 300KB/s
vs 1MB/s ).
>> Any hints what I can do to sped this up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
I just upgraded to qemu 0.8.0 including vlan/tap patch and I noticed that the
network speed is much slower than under 0.7.2 with tap patch ( 300KB/s vs 1MB/s
).
Any hints what I can do to sped this up ?
Helmut
No ideas what can cause this ? I just checked it
Hello,
I just upgraded to qemu 0.8.0 including vlan/tap patch and I noticed that the
network speed is much slower than under 0.7.2 with tap patch ( 300KB/s vs 1MB/s
).
Any hints what I can do to sped this up ?
Helmut
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qe
Hello!
Did you find out why qemu's networking is so slow?
Is that a general issue or is it just happening when running qemu on
windows?
What has actually been changed in version 0.7.2? (The changelog says
that improvements were made in user-mode-networking)
I guess the best way is to understand
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 26 aug 2005, at 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QEMU is working better from hour to hour :-)
Now I am looking for a way to get my data from the linux client to
the Win2K host. When I use the integrated smb I get a transfer rate
from about 15 KB :-(
the tftp is about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, QEMU is working better from hour to hour :-) Now I am looking for
a way to get my data from the linux client to the Win2K host. When I
use the integrated smb I get a transfer rate from about 15 KB :-( the
tftp is about 600 KBps and using WinSCP over the "redired" ssh
you can only open dos/fat32 partitions on raw images.
I usually keep one partition dos available for my linux guests,
so I can easily exchange data offline using this dos partition.
On 8/26/05, Helmut Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> >winimage.
> >There's also the possibility
Hi Christian,
winimage.
There's also the possibility to mount the img as a volume.
But there's a catch: both qemu and winimage want the
exclusivity of the image file. :(
I already tried WinImage ( V6 and v7 ). Both are telling me: Unable to
open ...
Which foramt should I use for the disk ?
winimage.
There's also the possibility to mount the img as a volume.
But there's a catch: both qemu and winimage want the
exclusivity of the image file. :(
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> QEMU is working better from hour to hour :-)
> Now I am looking for a way to
On 26 aug 2005, at 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QEMU is working better from hour to hour :-)
Now I am looking for a way to get my data from the linux client to
the Win2K host. When I use the integrated smb I get a transfer rate
from about 15 KB :-(
the tftp is about 600 KBps and using Wi
Hi,
QEMU is working better from hour to hour :-)
Now I am looking for a way to get my data from the linux client to the Win2K
host. When I use the integrated smb I get a transfer rate from about 15 KB :-(
the tftp is about 600 KBps and using WinSCP over the "redired" ssh connection
lead to 60 KBp
13 matches
Mail list logo
