Hi,
El 09/03/2011, a las 18:44, Jordan Justen escribió:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 05:43, Natalia Portillo wrote:
>> This may come late in the discussion, but, has OVMF been tested with Mac OS
>> X?
>
> No.
>
> I don't think Apple considers VMs an acceptable usage environment for
> OS X. Please
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 05:43, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> This may come late in the discussion, but, has OVMF been tested with Mac OS X?
No.
I don't think Apple considers VMs an acceptable usage environment for
OS X. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Thanks,
-Jordan
2011/3/9 Gleb Natapov :
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:13:38AM -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> Regarding UEFI non-volatile variables on real HW:
>> Most systems today have at least 1MB of flash storage located just
>> below 4GB. The entire contents can be modified, which is how firmware
>> updates ha
Hi all,
This may come late in the discussion, but, has OVMF been tested with Mac OS X?
A decent Intel Macintosh emulation requires of course EFI + HFS.
Regards,
Natalia Portillo
El 09/03/2011, a las 05:34, Jordan Justen escribió:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 18:23, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>> On Tue
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:13:38AM -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
> 2011/3/8 Gleb Natapov :
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:18:09AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> > Regarding the non-volatile variables issue, I have been trying to
> >> > develop a proposal for addressing this with a change to QEMU'
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 18:23, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:00:05AM -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> Yes, the UEFI system is still in place. The UEFI part still handles
>> the majority of platform init, and calls into the CSM at various
>> points. The CSM returns back to UEFI
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:00:05AM -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 23:18, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> >> The biggest issue that you guys care about for OVMF is a lack of
> >> legacy bios compatibility (CSM). There has be
2011/3/8 Gleb Natapov :
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:18:09AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > Regarding the non-volatile variables issue, I have been trying to
>> > develop a proposal for addressing this with a change to QEMU's
>> > hardware support of bios.bin. But, I don't have the suggestion
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 23:18, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> The biggest issue that you guys care about for OVMF is a lack of
>> legacy bios compatibility (CSM). There has been no progress in this
>> area. (However, it has now been suggested by
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:18:09AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Regarding the non-volatile variables issue, I have been trying to
> > develop a proposal for addressing this with a change to QEMU's
> > hardware support of bios.bin. But, I don't have the suggestion (or
> > implementation) ready
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 01:48, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Jordan, UEFI guest firmware comes up periodically. It seems to be a
>> feature that will be required in the future but as of today I don't
>> know of QEMU developers who are working on
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 01:48, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Jordan, UEFI guest firmware comes up periodically. It seems to be a
> feature that will be required in the future but as of today I don't
> know of QEMU developers who are working on or using it.
>
> Maybe you can start by giving an update on
On 6 March 2011 15:29, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> I would like to see the ability to run x86 on arm.
>
> I think there were some attempts to implement this and an outdated?
> support for arm on x86 exists but x86 cannot be emulated on arm so
> far.
ARM on x86 isn't outdated; it has bugs (what code
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 07:29, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 6 March 2011 05:12, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> I know you already have your own ideas to think of. :)
>>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011
>>>
>>> But, I am wondering if
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 07:29, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 6 March 2011 05:12, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> I know you already have your own ideas to think of. :)
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011
>>
>> But, I am wondering if any of you might have some UEFI or OVMF ideas for us:
>> htt
Hello
On 6 March 2011 05:12, Jordan Justen wrote:
> I know you already have your own ideas to think of. :)
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011
>
> But, I am wondering if any of you might have some UEFI or OVMF ideas for us:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php
I know you already have your own ideas to think of. :)
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011
But, I am wondering if any of you might have some UEFI or OVMF ideas for us:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php?title=GSOC2011
Thanks,
-Jordan
17 matches
Mail list logo
