On 2017-03-15 07:09, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 03:07 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 14 March 2017 at 17:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > Our ia64 host backend in QEMU (tcg/ia64) is still marked as maintained
> > > ... so it's maybe not as dead as you think? Or should we rather get rid
On 15.03.2017 10:40, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:09:55AM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 03/15/2017 03:07 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 14 March 2017 at 17:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
Our ia64 host backend in QEMU (tcg/ia64) is still marked as maintained
...
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:09:55AM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 03:07 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 14 March 2017 at 17:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > Our ia64 host backend in QEMU (tcg/ia64) is still marked as maintained
> > > ... so it's maybe not as dead as you think? Or shou
On 03/15/2017 03:07 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 March 2017 at 17:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
Our ia64 host backend in QEMU (tcg/ia64) is still marked as maintained
... so it's maybe not as dead as you think? Or should we rather get rid
of that soon, too?
I don't actually mind whether we keep tc
On 14 March 2017 at 17:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Our ia64 host backend in QEMU (tcg/ia64) is still marked as maintained
> ... so it's maybe not as dead as you think? Or should we rather get rid
> of that soon, too?
I don't actually mind whether we keep tcg/ia64 or drop it.
But if we keep it then w
On 14.03.2017 17:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:01:14PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 March 2017 at 09:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:02:01AM +0100,
