On 06/15/15 16:35, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek writes:
>
>> On 06/14/15 12:09, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> [...]
>>> Thank you Laszlo for your effort to get this done so quickly.
>>> Now let's wait for Michael/Markus opinion.
>>
>> Yes, let's. :)
>
> I'm fine with PATCH 2+3. Haven't l
Laszlo Ersek writes:
> On 06/14/15 12:09, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
[...]
>> Thank you Laszlo for your effort to get this done so quickly.
>> Now let's wait for Michael/Markus opinion.
>
> Yes, let's. :)
I'm fine with PATCH 2+3. Haven't looked closely at the other two.
Anything else you need from
On 06/14/15 12:09, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 06/13/2015 04:39 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Following up on this cross-posted message, I will send two patch sets,
>> one for QEMU (to qemu-devel) and another for OVMF (to edk2-devel). With
>> both in place, OVMF supports multiple PCI root buses, and
On 06/13/2015 04:39 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Following up on this cross-posted message, I will send two patch sets,
one for QEMU (to qemu-devel) and another for OVMF (to edk2-devel). With
both in place, OVMF supports multiple PCI root buses, and SeaBIOS
recognizes boot options that reference devic
Following up on this cross-posted message, I will send two patch sets,
one for QEMU (to qemu-devel) and another for OVMF (to edk2-devel). With
both in place, OVMF supports multiple PCI root buses, and SeaBIOS
recognizes boot options that reference devices behind PXBs.
* Background.
Since the last