On Monday 26 March 2007 22:37, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 26/03/07, Marc Lörner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 March 2007 00:08, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > > On 26/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > +# warning non-optimized CPU
> > > > >
On 26/03/07, Marc Lörner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007 00:08, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 26/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +# warning non-optimized CPU
> > > +#include
> > > +#include
> > > +
> > > static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks (
On Monday 26 March 2007 00:08, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 26/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +# warning non-optimized CPU
> > > +#include
> > > +#include
> > > +
> > > static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks (void)
> > > {
> > > -static int64_t ticks = 0;
>
On 26/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 21/03/07, Todd T. Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is relative to the 20070319 snapshot.
>
> --- cpu-all.h.orig Fri Mar 16 18:58:11 2007
> +++ cpu-all.h Tue Mar 20 21:14:10 2007
> @@ -1012,13 +1012,22 @@ static inlin
Hi,
On 21/03/07, Todd T. Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is relative to the 20070319 snapshot.
--- cpu-all.h.orig Fri Mar 16 18:58:11 2007
+++ cpu-all.h Tue Mar 20 21:14:10 2007
@@ -1012,13 +1012,22 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks
#endif
}
#else
-/* The host CPU does
This is relative to the 20070319 snapshot.
--- cpu-all.h.orig Fri Mar 16 18:58:11 2007
+++ cpu-all.h Tue Mar 20 21:14:10 2007
@@ -1012,13 +1012,22 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks
#endif
}
#else
-/* The host CPU doesn't have an easily accessible cycle counter.
- Just return
