On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:58 +0200, Filip Navara wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:10 +0200, Filip Navara wrote:
> >
> >
> >>J. Mayer wrote:
[...]
> >>wow, you repeated my and Fabrice's mistake once more ... think about the
> >>code below more :)
> >>note: when you'll be do
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:37 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> We agreed with Fabrice that there should be at least one more
> indirection in page mapping, because it would cost too much memory to
> try to map the whole needed memory space in one table, even if we can
> "forget" some of the middle bits in mo
J. Mayer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:10 +0200, Filip Navara wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Here's a long awaited patch (hum, Fabrice ? ;-) ).
It is really invasive in the target-ppc subdirectory.
[snip]
wow, you repeated my and Fabrice's mistake once more ... think about the
c
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:10 +0200, Filip Navara wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
>
> >Here's a long awaited patch (hum, Fabrice ? ;-) ).
> >It is really invasive in the target-ppc subdirectory.
> >
> >
> [snip]
>
> wow, you repeated my and Fabrice's mistake once more ... think about the
> code below m
J. Mayer wrote:
Here's a long awaited patch (hum, Fabrice ? ;-) ).
It is really invasive in the target-ppc subdirectory.
[snip]
wow, you repeated my and Fabrice's mistake once more ... think about the
code below more :)
note: when you'll be done thinking or run out of ideas see my x86-64
