On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 08:37:47AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2015-01-30 00:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
Is this an expected behaviour? I can't see why.
I'd like to know if there is a certain reason why it doesn't work. Or
if it should work and
El Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:37:47 +0100
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com escribió:
On 2015-01-30 00:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
Is this an expected behaviour? I can't see why.
I'd like to know if there is a certain reason why it doesn't work.
Or if
El Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:36:37 +0100
Frederic Konrad fred.kon...@greensocs.com escribió:
On 30/01/2015 11:26, Marc Marí wrote:
El Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:37:47 +0100
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com escribió:
On 2015-01-30 00:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
On 30/01/2015 11:26, Marc Marí wrote:
El Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:37:47 +0100
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com escribió:
On 2015-01-30 00:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
Is this an expected behaviour? I can't see why.
I'd like to know if there is a certain reason
On 2015-01-30 11:36, Frederic Konrad wrote:
On 30/01/2015 11:26, Marc Marí wrote:
El Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:37:47 +0100
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com escribió:
On 2015-01-30 00:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
Is this an expected behaviour? I can't see why.
Hi
I tried to run a Linux Kernel with Preempt RT patch on a QEMU emulated
machine using TCG (ARM guest, x86_64 guest).
I expected the guest to have high latencies, but more or less constant.
But I found, using cyclictest, a lot of randomness and a lot of
difference between the average and the
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
Is this an expected behaviour? I can't see why.
I'd like to know if there is a certain reason why it doesn't work. Or
if it should work and the problem is too much I/O overhead. Or any
other hint to understand it.
It is due to latencies in the host.
On 2015-01-30 00:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 20:37, Marc Marí wrote:
Is this an expected behaviour? I can't see why.
I'd like to know if there is a certain reason why it doesn't work. Or
if it should work and the problem is too much I/O overhead. Or any
other hint to
