On 06/06/2011 10:30 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:27:55 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangeberra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we should make reason a dictionary so that we can
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:39:45 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz
On 06/07/2011 10:54 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:39:45 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf
On 06/07/2011 10:41 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Luiz Capitulinolcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way.
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:32:14 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/07/2011 10:54 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:39:45 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51
On 06/07/2011 12:43 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:32:14 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Sorry, I meant to ask, what's the difference between low level and
unknown.
low level is EIO, unknown is everything else (EINVAL, EPIPE, ...).
How can you document
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:43:27 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/07/2011 12:43 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:32:14 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Sorry, I meant to ask, what's the difference between low level and
unknown.
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more
space
is allocated and the VM is
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B. query-stop-reason
I also have a simple solution for item 2.
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
[...]
you can call the reason whatever you want, but don't call it
stringfied errno name :-)
Care to explain why?
Found a bit of explanation downthread. Sorry for the noise.
On 06/06/2011 06:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolfkw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we should make reason a dictionary so that we can group related
information when we extend the field, for example:
reason: { no
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:27:55 +0100
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we should make reason a dictionary so that we can group related
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:01:24PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P.
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:01:24PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:01:24PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri
On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
errors stop a guest) instead of trying to model an internal QEMU
concept (vm_stop()).
If you have other user visible concepts
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
errors stop a guest) instead of trying to model an internal QEMU
On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
introduce one. Here's what I propose:
SQMP
query-status
Return a json-object with the following information:
- running: true if the VM is running, or false
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:39:41 +0100
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel
On 06/03/2011 08:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
introduce one. Here's what I propose:
SQMP
query-status
Return a json-object with the following information:
- running:
On 06/03/2011 08:44 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:39:41 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangeberra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony
On 2011-06-03 15:51, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 08:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
introduce one. Here's what I propose:
SQMP
query-status
Return a
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:51:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 08:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
introduce one. Here's what I propose:
SQMP
query-status
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:35:03PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more
space
is
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:35:03PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
timestamp: { seconds: 1265044230, microseconds: 450486 } }
Valid error reasons could be: enospc, eio, etc.
No etc :-) Error reasons should we be well known and well
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B. query-stop-reason
I also have a simple solution for item 2. The vm_stop() accepts a reason
argument, so we could store it somewhere and return it as a
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B. query-stop-reason
I also have a simple solution for item 2. The vm_stop() accepts a reason
argument, so we
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B. query-stop-reason
I
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM
is
started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered,
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people
On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B.
On 06/02/2011 01:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:32:25 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:33:52 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03
On 06/02/2011 01:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:32:25 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri
On 06/02/2011 02:13 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:33:52 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more space
is allocated and the VM is put to run again.
QMP has two limitations that prevent people from doing this today:
1. The
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more space
is allocated and the VM is put to run again.
QMP has two limitations that
46 matches
Mail list logo
