On 19/07/2016 15:29, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:21:05 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 19/07/2016 13:59, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> If it's internal, do we have any reason to register a (writeable)
>>> property in the first place? Why not use a plain old
>>> "
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:21:05 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/07/2016 13:59, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> > > If it's internal, do we have any reason to register a (writeable)
> >>> > > property in the first place? Why not use a plain old
> >>> > > "obj->field = value" C statement? Or, if a sim
On 19/07/2016 13:59, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> > > If it's internal, do we have any reason to register a (writeable)
>>> > > property in the first place? Why not use a plain old
>>> > > "obj->field = value" C statement? Or, if a simple assignment
>>> > > isn't enough, why not a simple obj_set_fi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:23:04AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:33:53 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:53 -0300
> > > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 a
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:33:53PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:53 -0300
> > > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:33:53 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:53 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:30:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > > Am 15.07.2016 um 18:10 sc
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:33:53PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:53 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:30:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > > Am 15.07.2016 um 18:10 s
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:53 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:30:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > Am 15.07.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:11:38AM +0200, I
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:43:53 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:30:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 15.07.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:11:38AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:35:30 +0200
> > >> And
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 06:30:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 15.07.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:11:38AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:35:30 +0200
> >> Andrew Jones wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 05:07:43PM -0300, Edua
Am 15.07.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:11:38AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:35:30 +0200
>> Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 05:07:43PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
First of all, sorry for the horrible delay in
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:11:38AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:35:30 +0200
> Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 05:07:43PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >
> > > First of all, sorry for the horrible delay in replying to this
> > > thread.
> > >
> > > On W
12 matches
Mail list logo