Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool technogies?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and
It really depends on Fabrice or another contributions from developers..
If Intel or AMD want to donate a machine with VanderPool/Pacificia to
Fabrice, maybe he'll add it :)
Hetz
On 11/6/05, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware
On Sunday 06 November 2005 15:19, Dave Feustel wrote:
Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool
technogies?
qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer, so these extensions don't really
help.
On Sunday 06 November 2005 10:33, Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2005 15:19, Dave Feustel wrote:
Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool
technogies?
qemu is an emulator, not a
Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2005 15:19, Dave Feustel wrote:
Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool
technogies?
qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer, so these extensions
Mark Williamson wrote:
qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer, so these extensions don't really
help.
They could be leveraged by kqemu one day...
/me thinks we'll see a rash of Linux kernel hypervisor modules when VTX /
SVM hardware is available.
Indeed. I've already started my own
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:57:37PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer, so these extensions don't really
help.
Not quite.
qemu is technically a JIT. kqemu/qvm86 are virtualizers. Bochs is an
actual emulator.
VT/SVM won't help the JIT part of
Jim C. Brown wrote:
VT/SVM will definitely improve the performance of kqemu/qvm86.
VT/SVM won't actually help them that much in the current case, assuming that my
understanding is correct. They can only make the userland bits a little
faster, and kqemu/qvm86 don't support running kernel
