On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 12:20 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
The thing I see is different is that the n32 ABI redefines elf_greg_t
and elf_caddr_t as 32 bits. Maybe I missed something but those types
seem not to be used by the ELF loader (or maybe I should look in a more
J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
The thing I see is different is that the n32 ABI redefines elf_greg_t
and elf_caddr_t as 32 bits. Maybe I missed something but those types
seem not to be used by the ELF loader (or maybe I should look in a more
recent kernel ;-) ).
Then, I have seen no apparent issue
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 04:35 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it
appeared
to
J. Mayer wrote:
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF loader.
But the ELF fields are tied to the ELFCLASS of the supported ABI, not to
the register width of the machine
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF loader.
But the ELF fields are tied to the ELFCLASS of
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:39:15AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF loader.
I tried to fix this. I also noticed that the image infos
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF loader.
I tried to fix this. I also noticed that the image infos start_data
field was not computed as the Linux kernel does. As the ARM
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 04:15 +0200, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:39:15AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF loader.
I
