On 8/6/19 5:48 AM, Maxim Blinov wrote:
> slli 00 ... 001 . 0010011 @sh
> srli 00 ... 101 . 0010011 @sh
> srai 01 ... 101 . 0010011 @sh
>
> First question: Why does the %sh10 field exist? There are no 10-bit
> shamt fields
Hi all,
I've been going through the insn32.decode file, and found some
confusing inconsistencies with the ISA spec that I don't understand. I
hope some of you can clarify.
There is a field defined called "%sh10" as follows:
%sh1020:10
Which is used in the "@sh" format as follows:
@sh ..
