[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..

2010-01-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 18 January 2010, john cooper wrote: > +.name = "Conroe", > +.level = 2, > +.vendor1 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1, > +.vendor2 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2, > +.vendor3 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3, > +.family = 6, /* P6 */ > +.model = 2,

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..

2010-01-05 Thread john cooper
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:46:36AM -0500, john cooper wrote: >> +{ >> +.name = "Opteron_G2", >> +.level = 5, >> +.vendor1 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1, >> +.vendor2 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2, >> +.vendor3 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3, > > Silly

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..

2009-12-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
Please use actual cpu models verses family names. Nehalem is a wide class of processors and the EX has a fair bit that isn't present in earlier models. The patch also doesn't follow CODING_STYLE. On Dec 21, 2009 1:13 AM, "john cooper" wrote: This adds definitions for contemporary processors wh

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..

2009-12-24 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:46:36AM -0500, john cooper wrote: > This adds definitions for contemporary processors > which may be selected via -cpu , as an > alternative to the existing use of -cpu qemu64 > augmented with a series of feature flags. > > The primary motivation was determination of a >