On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 21:26 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-02-01 20:17, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > If the machine is stopped, we should not record two different tsc values
> > upon a save operation. The same problem happens with kvmclock.
> >
> > But kvmclock is taking a different diretion, bein
On 2011-02-01 20:17, Glauber Costa wrote:
> If the machine is stopped, we should not record two different tsc values
> upon a save operation. The same problem happens with kvmclock.
>
> But kvmclock is taking a different diretion, being now seen as a separate
> device. Since this is unlikely to ha
