Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
2007/9/24, Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
I had a discussion with Johannes Schindelin over my patch, that I
thought is on the maillist, but apparently it wasn't.
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
I think you were referring to the small patch I sent. I actually gave up
with it, as I don't see how to make it in a clean way.
Honestly I found your suggestion to try to have it less special-casing
vvfat a bit puzzling... vvfat is the
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
I've been having problems using vvfat virtual block device. Even linux
fdisk was able to find problems with it. The reason turned out to be
simple, MBR have bogus parameters.
Thanks for doing this; I did not find any
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
While you are working on vvfat issues, could you give a look to the
attached small patch?
Okay, this is what I would do:
- not make this handling dependent on vvfat (but this means checking if
the colon is the second character, because
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
While you are working on vvfat issues, could you give a look to the
attached small patch?
Okay, this is what I would do:
- not make this handling dependent on vvfat (but this means checking if
the colon is the
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
I was concerned by having this handling outside of a proper place (i.e.
block-vvfat.c), but if we want to leave it there, wouldn't it be better
to just handle cases which would otherwise fail, and just try to fix the
fat: format?
I don't
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:
I was concerned by having this handling outside of a proper place (i.e.
block-vvfat.c), but if we want to leave it there, wouldn't it be better
to just handle cases which would otherwise fail, and just try to fix
