On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:21:39PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> >> It's really not that much of a fast path. Unless you're doing something
> >> particularly obscure then even under heavy load you're unlikely to exceed
> >> a few kHz.
> >
> >I think with kvm, heavy disk stressing benchmark can get hig
>> It's really not that much of a fast path. Unless you're doing something
>> particularly obscure then even under heavy load you're unlikely to exceed
>> a few kHz.
>
>I think with kvm, heavy disk stressing benchmark can get higher.
I'd still expect this to be the least of your problems.
If not
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:38:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:21:46PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > At least I think irq_disable can be removed
>
> The following patch on top of mine removes irq_disabled field in
> PCIDevice. I am of two minds whether this ma
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:41:03PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > No, this would slow us down because these are per-pin.
> > We need a sum of interrupts so that config space
> > can be updated by a single command.
> > Interrupts are a fastpath, extra loops there should be avoided.
>
> It's really no
> No, this would slow us down because these are per-pin.
> We need a sum of interrupts so that config space
> can be updated by a single command.
> Interrupts are a fastpath, extra loops there should be avoided.
It's really not that much of a fast path. Unless you're doing something
particularly
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:21:46PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> At least I think irq_disable can be removed
The following patch on top of mine removes irq_disabled field in
PCIDevice. I am of two minds whether this makes the code better.
What is your opinion?
diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
i
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:21:46PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > This patchset adds support for mandatory interupt
> > status and interrupt disable bits to all
> > PCI devices. This is required for PCI compliancy.
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This patchset adds support for mandatory interupt
> status and interrupt disable bits to all
> PCI devices. This is required for PCI compliancy.
>
> These patches are on top of my pci tree,
> including Isaku Yamahata's fixes.
>
