On 05/14/10 15:21, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Jes Sorensen
>>
>> Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
>> number, without any supporting text.
>
> I'm not a huge fan of the name.
It was the lesser evil I coul
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:21:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
> >From: Jes Sorensen
> >
> >Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
> >number, without any supporting text.
> >
>
> I'm not a huge fan of the name.
On 05/14/2010 09:21 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Jes Sorensen
>>
>> Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
>> number, without any supporting text.
>>
>
> I'm not a huge fan of the name.
>
> But what info
On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
I'm not a huge fan of the name.
But what information are we trying to convey? Just major/minor number
or would
