On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:33:22 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [14:52:36], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > My suggestion for the immediate term is to do what we have been doing
> > > > so
> > > > far, ie. call it VIRTIO_SERIAL_ADD. Worst case here is: we add a new way
> > > > to grou
Amit Shah wrote:
> > Without this specific thing, which is an indicator that guest has lost
> > state outside its control, the guest<->host communication is
> > unreliable (even for things like "cut and paste"), so every app that
> > cares has to implement a packet framing protocol with no binary d
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [14:52:36], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > My suggestion for the immediate term is to do what we have been doing so
> > > far, ie. call it VIRTIO_SERIAL_ADD. Worst case here is: we add a new way
> > > to group events which requires a new VIRTIO_SERIAL event, in this case we
> >
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:13:09 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [11:29:03], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:56:20 +0530
> > Amit Shah wrote:
> >
> > > On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [10:14:02], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +VIRTIO_SERIAL
> > > > > > >
On 03/26/2010 09:29 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:56:20 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [10:14:02], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
+
+VIRTIO_SERIAL
+-
It should be VIRTIO_SERIAL_ADD.
What about other events that VIRTI
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [14:44:23], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > Problem is we're going to have to maintain a lot of state if we're going
> > to provide guarantees.
> >
> > One solution is to always have an in-qemu user of the serial
> > functionality that sits between the app and the g
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [11:29:03], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:56:20 +0530
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
> > On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [10:14:02], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +VIRTIO_SERIAL
> > > > > > +-
> > > > >
> > > > > It should be VIRTIO_SERIAL_ADD.
>
Amit Shah wrote:
> Problem is we're going to have to maintain a lot of state if we're going
> to provide guarantees.
>
> One solution is to always have an in-qemu user of the serial
> functionality that sits between the app and the guest and the in-qemu
> user can signal to the app about such thin
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:56:20 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [10:14:02], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > > +
> > > > > +VIRTIO_SERIAL
> > > > > +-
> > > >
> > > > It should be VIRTIO_SERIAL_ADD.
> > >
> > > What about other events that VIRTIO_SERIAL generates?
> >
> >
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [05:23:25], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > > Sure. Does the host app see an EOF on its input when that happens?
> > > (I.e. *not* like a real serial port).
> >
> > If it's an in-qemu app, it gets the guest_closed() callback. So I guess
> > qmp events for non-qemu
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [10:14:02], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +VIRTIO_SERIAL
> > > > +-
> > >
> > > It should be VIRTIO_SERIAL_ADD.
> >
> > What about other events that VIRTIO_SERIAL generates?
>
> We don't address this problem currently, maybe an integration with qdev
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [10:05:07], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:26:07 +0530
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
> > Also, if it might help, the 'guest device ready' and 'guest port ready'
> > QMP events can be sent on success as well (right now they're only sent
> > on failure).
>
> Although
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:46:28 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) Mar 25 2010 [15:55:41], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> > Amit Shah wrote:
> >
> > > When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> > > might be interested in knowing and the
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:26:07 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> Also, if it might help, the 'guest device ready' and 'guest port ready'
> QMP events can be sent on success as well (right now they're only sent
> on failure).
Although this seems to be make, would be good to have clients' writers
feedback o
Amit Shah wrote:
> > Sure. Does the host app see an EOF on its input when that happens?
> > (I.e. *not* like a real serial port).
>
> If it's an in-qemu app, it gets the guest_closed() callback. So I guess
> qmp events for non-qemu apps is what you're looking for?
See below.
> > But what I real
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [04:07:54], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [01:17:49], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:17 +0530
> > > > Amit Shah wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrot
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [01:17:49], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:17 +0530
> > > Amit Shah wrote:
> > >
> > > > On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> > > > > Amit Shah
On (Thu) Mar 25 2010 [15:55:41], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
> > When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> > might be interested in knowing and then cleaning up the host-side of the
> > port. Introduce QMP events
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [01:17:49], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:17 +0530
> > Amit Shah wrote:
> >
> > > On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> > > > Amit Shah wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When
On (Thu) Mar 25 2010 [15:34:06], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:17 +0530
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
> > On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> > > Amit Shah wrote:
> > >
> > > > When adding a port or a device to the guest
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:17 +0530
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
> > On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> > > Amit Shah wrote:
> > >
> > > > When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> > >
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> might be interested in knowing and then cleaning up the host-side of the
> port. Introduce QMP events to signal such errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
> CC: Luiz Cap
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:17:17 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> > Amit Shah wrote:
> >
> > > When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> > > might be interested in knowing and the
On (Wed) Mar 24 2010 [17:34:15], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
> > When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> > might be interested in knowing and then cleaning up the host-side of the
> > port. Introduce QMP events
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0530
Amit Shah wrote:
> When adding a port or a device to the guest fails, management software
> might be interested in knowing and then cleaning up the host-side of the
> port. Introduce QMP events to signal such errors.
I'm completely unfamiliar with virtio-seria
25 matches
Mail list logo
