(2010/10/15 22:30), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>> (2010/10/15 10:06), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
is the
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> (2010/10/15 10:06), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
> >> There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
> >> is the only one that being broadcasted.
> >>
> >> Ac
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:52 +0800, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> (2010/10/15 10:06), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
> >> There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
> >> is the only one that being broadcasted.
> >>
> >> According
(2010/10/15 10:06), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
>> There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
>> is the only one that being broadcasted.
>>
>> According to the x86 ASDM vol.3A 15.10.4.1,
>> MCE signal is broadcast on proc
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:55:28PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
> There is no reason why SRAO event received by the main thread
> is the only one that being broadcasted.
>
> According to the x86 ASDM vol.3A 15.10.4.1,
> MCE signal is broadcast on processor version 06H_EH or later.
>
> This change i
