On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:43:40 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
> >
> > So, I won't nack it and the bigger mid-term discussion we should have
> > is whether or not it's ok to mix qerror_report(), error_printf() &
> > friends in handlers.
>
> I think mixing is both unavoid
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:50:20 -0300
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:56:49 +0100
>> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> > While fully converted handlers are not supposed to print anything when
>> > running in a QMP monitor, they are free to print in a hum
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:50:20 -0300
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:56:49 +0100
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> > While fully converted handlers are not supposed to print anything when
> > running in a QMP monitor, they are free to print in a human monitor.
>
> I disagree.
I've
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:06:42 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:56:49 +0100
> > Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> >> While fully converted handlers are not supposed to print anything when
> >> running in a QMP monitor, they are free to print in a
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:56:49 +0100
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> While fully converted handlers are not supposed to print anything when
>> running in a QMP monitor, they are free to print in a human monitor.
>
> I disagree.
>
> One of the key decisions behind the ne
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:56:49 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> While fully converted handlers are not supposed to print anything when
> running in a QMP monitor, they are free to print in a human monitor.
I disagree.
One of the key decisions behind the new Monitor design is that handlers
are p
