Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.09.2010 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> This fixes a couple nasty problems relating to live migration.
>>
>> 1) When dealing with shared storage with weak coherence (i.e. NFS), even if
>>we re-read, we may end up with undesired caching. By delaying any reads
>>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 05:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/11/2010 05:04 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> This fixes a couple nasty problems relating to live migration.
>>>
>>> 1) When dealing with shared storage with weak coherence (i.e. NFS),
>>> even if
>>> we re-read, we ma
On 09/14/2010 02:51 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 09/14/2010 04:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/13/2010 04:34 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 09/13/2010 09:13 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
I think the only real advantage is that we fix NFS migration, right?
That's the one that we know about, yes.
The
On 09/14/2010 04:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/13/2010 04:34 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 09/13/2010 09:13 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
I think the only real advantage is that we fix NFS migration, right?
That's the one that we know about, yes.
The rest is not a specific scenario, but a strong fe
On 09/13/2010 04:34 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 09/13/2010 09:13 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
I think the only real advantage is that we fix NFS migration, right?
That's the one that we know about, yes.
The rest is not a specific scenario, but a strong feeling that having an
image opened twice at
Am 13.09.2010 22:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 09/13/2010 03:03 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 13.09.2010 21:29, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>>
Am 13.09.2010 15:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 09/13/2010 08:
On 09/13/2010 03:03 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.09.2010 21:29, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.09.2010 15:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 09/13/2010 08:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Yeah, one of the key design points of
Am 13.09.2010 21:29, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 13.09.2010 15:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> On 09/13/2010 08:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Yeah, one of the key design points of live migration is to minimize the
> number of failure sc
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 13.09.2010 15:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On 09/13/2010 08:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Yeah, one of the key design points of live migration is to minimize the
number of failure scenarios where you lose a VM. If someone typed the
>
On 09/13/2010 09:13 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
I think the only real advantage is that we fix NFS migration, right?
That's the one that we know about, yes.
The rest is not a specific scenario, but a strong feeling that having an
image opened twice at the same time feels dangerous.
We've neve
Am 13.09.2010 15:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 09/13/2010 08:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Yeah, one of the key design points of live migration is to minimize the
>>> number of failure scenarios where you lose a VM. If someone typed the
>>> wrong command line or shared storage hasn't been mount
On 09/13/2010 08:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Yeah, one of the key design points of live migration is to minimize the
number of failure scenarios where you lose a VM. If someone typed the
wrong command line or shared storage hasn't been mounted yet and we
delay failure until live migration is in the
Am 13.09.2010 15:29, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 09/13/2010 03:32 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 11.09.2010 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>
>>> This fixes a couple nasty problems relating to live migration.
>>>
>>> 1) When dealing with shared storage with weak coherence (i.e. NFS), even if
>>
On 09/13/2010 03:32 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 11.09.2010 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
This fixes a couple nasty problems relating to live migration.
1) When dealing with shared storage with weak coherence (i.e. NFS), even if
we re-read, we may end up with undesired caching. By delayi
Am 11.09.2010 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> This fixes a couple nasty problems relating to live migration.
>
> 1) When dealing with shared storage with weak coherence (i.e. NFS), even if
>we re-read, we may end up with undesired caching. By delaying any reads
>until we absolutely have
15 matches
Mail list logo