On 2011-01-17 03:08, Huang Ying wrote:
As indicated, I'm sitting on lots of fixes and refactorings of the MCE
user space code. How do you test your patches? Any suggestions how to do
this efficiently would be warmly welcome.
>>>
>>> We use a self-made test script to test. Repository
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 16:38 +0800, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 14.01.2011 02:51, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:01 +0800, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Am 13.01.2011 09:34, Huang Ying wrote:
[snip]
> >>> +
> >>> +void kvm_unpoison_all(void *param)
> >>
> >> Minor nit: This can be static now.
>
Am 14.01.2011 02:51, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:01 +0800, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2011 09:34, Huang Ying wrote:
>>> In Linux kernel HWPoison processing implementation, the virtual
>>> address in processes mapping the error physical memory page is marked
>>> as HWPoison. So
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:01 +0800, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 13.01.2011 09:34, Huang Ying wrote:
> > In Linux kernel HWPoison processing implementation, the virtual
> > address in processes mapping the error physical memory page is marked
> > as HWPoison. So that, the further accessing to the virtual
Am 13.01.2011 09:34, Huang Ying wrote:
> In Linux kernel HWPoison processing implementation, the virtual
> address in processes mapping the error physical memory page is marked
> as HWPoison. So that, the further accessing to the virtual
> address will kill corresponding processes with SIGBUS.
>
Am 13.01.2011 09:34, Huang Ying wrote:
> In Linux kernel HWPoison processing implementation, the virtual
> address in processes mapping the error physical memory page is marked
> as HWPoison. So that, the further accessing to the virtual
> address will kill corresponding processes with SIGBUS.
>
