Am 15.09.2010 um 21:50 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Andreas Färber > wrote:
Maybe return -1 and set errno to the posix_madvise() return code?
(but is it
errno = -retval or errno = retval then?)
An advantage of posix_madvise() semantics is that no mucking with
errno i
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 15.09.2010 um 21:00 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>
>> madvise() actually
>> returns 0 or -1 with error code in errno. Should we try to match that?
>
> posix_madvise() doesn't seem to... "otherwise, an error number shall be
> returned to indicate t
Am 15.09.2010 um 21:00 schrieb Blue Swirl:
madvise() actually
returns 0 or -1 with error code in errno. Should we try to match that?
posix_madvise() doesn't seem to... "otherwise, an error number shall
be returned to indicate the error"
It documents EINVAL for invalid advice, and so does m
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> From: Andreas Färber
>
> vl.c has a Sun-specific hack to supply a prototype for madvise(),
> but the call site has apparently moved to arch_init.c.
>
> Haiku doesn't implement madvise() in favor of posix_madvise().
> OpenBSD and Solaris 10
