On 02/16/2011 08:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/16/2011 02:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2011 01:59, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/15/2011 07:38 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
Kevin
On 02/16/2011 08:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/16/2011 02:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2011 01:59, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/15/2011 07:38 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
Kevin
Am 16.02.2011 14:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 02/16/2011 02:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 16.02.2011 01:59, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>
>>> On 02/15/2011 07:38 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
Kevin Wolf wrote:
On 02/16/2011 02:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2011 01:59, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/15/2011 07:38 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 14.02.2011 20:34, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Lu
Am 16.02.2011 01:59, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 02/15/2011 07:38 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
>> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 14.02.2011 20:34, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>
On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On
On 02/15/2011 07:38 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 14.02.2011 20:34, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/14
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:34:11 -0600
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
>> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> So
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:20:01 +0100
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.02.2011 20:34, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
> >> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>>
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:15:27 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 01:58 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > No, of course not, our plan has always been to do this via an schema,
> > the only reason we don't do this today is lack of time/help.
> >
> >
>
> Understood--I'm here to help now :
Am 14.02.2011 20:34, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>
So the question is: how does the schema based design support ex
On 02/14/2011 06:32 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 14.02.2011 13:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/14/2011 03:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.02.2011 19:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Proposal for events in QAPI
For QAPI, I'd like to model events on the notion of signals and
slots[2
On 02/14/2011 01:58 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
No, of course not, our plan has always been to do this via an schema,
the only reason we don't do this today is lack of time/help.
Understood--I'm here to help now :-)
We need to expose the schema, I'm not saying we shouldn't. But we don't
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:58:00 -0200
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:34:11 -0600
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
> > > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:34:11 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>
> >>> So the question is: how does the schema ba
On 02/14/2011 12:34 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
So the question is: how does the schema based design support extending
commands or events? Does it require adding new commands/even
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:39:11 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > So the question is: how does the schema based design support extending
> > commands or events? Does it require adding new commands/events?
> >
>
> Well, let me ask you, how do we do
On 02/14/2011 06:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
So the question is: how does the schema based design support extending
commands or events? Does it require adding new commands/events?
Well, let me ask you, how do we do that today?
Let's say that I want to add a new parameter to the `change'
On 02/14/2011 07:28 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:08:04 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
In my QAPI branch[1], I've now got almost every existing QMP command
converted with (hopefully) all of the hard problems solved. There is
only one remaining thing to attack before
On 02/14/2011 07:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:28:52AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:08:04 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
In my QAPI branch[1], I've now got almost every existing QMP command
converted with (hopefully) all of th
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:28:52AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:08:04 -0600
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In my QAPI branch[1], I've now got almost every existing QMP command
> > converted with (hopefully) all of the hard problems solved. There is
> > on
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:08:04 -0600
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my QAPI branch[1], I've now got almost every existing QMP command
> converted with (hopefully) all of the hard problems solved. There is
> only one remaining thing to attack before posting for inclusion and
> that's event
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:32:45 +0100
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.02.2011 13:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > On 02/14/2011 03:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> Am 13.02.2011 19:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> >>> Proposal for events in QAPI
> >>>
> >>> For QAPI, I'd like to model events on the notion of s
Am 14.02.2011 13:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 02/14/2011 03:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 13.02.2011 19:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> Proposal for events in QAPI
>>>
>>> For QAPI, I'd like to model events on the notion of signals and
>>> slots[2]. A client would explicitly connect to a si
On 02/14/2011 03:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.02.2011 19:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Hi,
In my QAPI branch[1], I've now got almost every existing QMP command
converted with (hopefully) all of the hard problems solved. There is
only one remaining thing to attack before posting for inclus
Am 13.02.2011 19:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Hi,
>
> In my QAPI branch[1], I've now got almost every existing QMP command
> converted with (hopefully) all of the hard problems solved. There is
> only one remaining thing to attack before posting for inclusion and
> that's events. Here's my
25 matches
Mail list logo
