Anthony Liguori wrote:
I like this idea but I have some suggestions about the general approach.
I think instead of defining another machine type, it would be better to
just have a command line option like -cpuid that took a comma separate
string of features with all meaning all features that
Paul Brook wrote:
I think qemu-cvs has a -cpu option for non-x86 which could be used for
this. Agree machine types are the wrong approach.
Yep, machine types are already used to switch between a different concept
so using the new -cpu option would make sense. Could perhaps extend the
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 20:45 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's a pity not to use a host CPU feature if it is available. This patch
exposes host CPU features to guests. It allows fine-tuning the presented
features from the command-line.
The code could use some serious clean ups, but
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 20:45 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's a pity not to use a host CPU feature if it is available. This patch
exposes host CPU features to guests. It allows fine-tuning the presented
features from the command-line.
The code could use some
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:34:45PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 20:45 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's a pity not to use a host CPU feature if it is available. This patch
exposes host CPU features to guests. It allows fine-tuning the
I think qemu-cvs has a -cpu option for non-x86 which could be used for
this. Agree machine types are the wrong approach.
Yep, machine types are already used to switch between a different concept
so using the new -cpu option would make sense. Could perhaps extend the
syntax so that
