On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:26:06AM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 2/9/08, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > >> If you look at the patch, there are no timing dependencies; the only
> > > >> parameter is the depth
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 2/9/08, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Blue Swirl wrote:
> > >> If you look at the patch, there are no timing dependencies; the only
> > >> parameter is the depth of the virtual queue. The exhaustion is
> > >> completely controlled
On 2/9/08, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>
> >> If you look at the patch, there are no timing dependencies; the only
> >> parameter is the depth of the virtual queue. The exhaustion is
> >> completely controlled by target OS access patterns.
> >
> > Thanks, this
Blue Swirl wrote:
If you look at the patch, there are no timing dependencies; the only
parameter is the depth of the virtual queue. The exhaustion is
completely controlled by target OS access patterns.
Thanks, this clarified the difference. But I'll rephrase my original comment:
The patch lo
On 2/9/08, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 2/9/08, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Here's a patch Peter Anvin wrote so the serial I/O doesn't flood the
> >> kernel.
> >
> > The patch looks OK, but the throttling should benefit all devices, as
> > di
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/9/08, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a patch Peter Anvin wrote so the serial I/O doesn't flood the kernel.
The patch looks OK, but the throttling should benefit all devices, as
discussed here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-12/msg00283.h
On 2/9/08, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch Peter Anvin wrote so the serial I/O doesn't flood the kernel.
The patch looks OK, but the throttling should benefit all devices, as
discussed here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-12/msg00283.html
Here's a patch Peter Anvin wrote so the serial I/O doesn't flood the kernel.
Here's the thread on linux-kernel aboout it:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/5/401
Rob
On Thursday 07 February 2008 15:19:39 you wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > Specifically, qemu isn't paravirtualized, it's fully virtualiz
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 15:07:27 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > When running a 2.6.24 kernel built for x86-64 under qemu via serial
> > console, doing CPU-intensive things that also produce a lot of output
> > (such as compiling software) tends to produce the error message in th
