On Saturday 20 March 2010 23:00:49 Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 20.03.2010 um 15:02 schrieb Mohammed Gamal m.gamal...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2010 10:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
I'd say that a GSoC project would rather focus on
Avi Kivity wrote:
Either way - then we should make the goal of the project to support those
old boot loaders. IMHO it should contain visibility. Doing theoretical
stuff is just less fun for all parties. Or does that stuff work already?
Mostly those old guests aged beyond usefulness. They
On 03/19/2010 05:29 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
Hello all,
As some of you might know, I've worked on supporting big real mode
emulation on VMX back in GSoC 2008. Looking at the Qemu GSoC ideas
list for this year, I found it among the possible ideas for a GSoC
project. I'd be interested in driving
On 20.03.2010, at 08:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/19/2010 05:29 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
Hello all,
As some of you might know, I've worked on supporting big real mode
emulation on VMX back in GSoC 2008. Looking at the Qemu GSoC ideas
list for this year, I found it among the possible ideas
On 03/20/2010 10:34 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Interestingly enough Hannes just tried to boot a Windows 98 VM on SVM yesterday
and failed, while the same VM worked (mostly) with -no-kvm. So apparently
there's more missing to it than just big real mode.
Was there an error message?
I'd
On 20.03.2010, at 09:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/20/2010 10:34 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Interestingly enough Hannes just tried to boot a Windows 98 VM on SVM
yesterday and failed, while the same VM worked (mostly) with -no-kvm. So
apparently there's more missing to it than just big real
On 03/20/2010 10:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
I'd say that a GSoC project would rather focus on making a guest OS work than
working on generic big real mode. Having Windows 98 support is way more visible
to the users. And hopefully more fun to implement too, as it's a visible goal
:-).
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2010 10:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
I'd say that a GSoC project would rather focus on making a guest OS work
than working on generic big real mode. Having Windows 98 support is way
more
visible to the users. And
Am 20.03.2010 um 15:02 schrieb Mohammed Gamal m.gamal...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2010 10:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
I'd say that a GSoC project would rather focus on making a guest
OS work
than working on generic big real
