On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that qemu is capable of decently running _something_ on
sparc, so the problems I'm seeing are more likely to be uClibc
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is sparc
using software emulated floating point at the
2010/2/20 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that qemu is capable of decently running _something_
on
sparc, so the
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is
2010/2/20 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is sparc
using
On 2/20/10, Artyom Tarasenko atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/2/20 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On 2/20/10, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
2010/2/17 Rob Landley r...@landley.net:
But it does imply that
On Saturday 20 February 2010 15:59:31 Blue Swirl wrote:
I've got 2.6.32 booting to a command prompt (albeit with serial console
and intentionall restricted set of hardware). But then it misbehaves.
I'll try getting 2.6.18 to build with a known .config, and then bisect
forward if that
