On 01/05/2010 07:06 AM, john cooper wrote:
> Nehalem is really just a code name. Would it be better to use core-i7?
I'd inquired whether marketing sanctioned names existed but
didn't receive anything conclusive. The resulting monikers
at least are in common usage.
Unfortunately it goes on a
On 12/22/2009 11:56 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Are you joking? Even as a casual users, when would you ever run
Windows without networking these days???! I don't think you can even
buy a computer without networking any more:-)
Probably not. :)
Or do you mean something else by "networked images"
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> >>No, Windows tries to detect changes in your hardware and assumes that
> >>if too many things change, you might be a pirate and requires you to
> >>phone their offices to re-authenticate.
> >
> >'Just' the CPU is not big deal. Might hit you with two 'bad' points.
> >Netwo
No, Windows tries to detect changes in your hardware and assumes that
if too many things change, you might be a pirate and requires you to
phone their offices to re-authenticate.
'Just' the CPU is not big deal. Might hit you with two 'bad' points.
Network interface + CPU will require re-activa
On 12/21/2009 08:48 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Well, I wouldn't be too sure on that one. Software may use SSE3 instructions
to access MMIO in which case we do have to emulate it.
Unfortunately this is already a reality. Look here:
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread
