On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/12/7 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
or less similar on
According to comment in exec-all.h:
/* Deterministic execution requires that IO only be performed on the last
instruction of a TB so that interrupts take effect immediately. */
Sparc generator must then violate this assumption. Is the assumption
valid also when not using icount and
2009/12/7 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
or less similar on all platforms) reacts to irqs slower than a real
hardware due to tcg
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
atar4q...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
or less similar on all platforms) reacts to irqs slower than a real
hardware due to tcg optimizations?
I see one test pattern which fails on
