On 08/27/2010 12:57 AM, walt wrote:
Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's
worth trying.
Using that flag wipes out the difference entirely: both come in at
about 65 seconds.
I also tried xp-
On 08/25/2010 04:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 06:09 PM, walt wrote:
On 08/25/2010 12:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote:
I find that qemu-kvm boots to the Win7 login prompt in 25 seconds,
while qemu with kvm enabled takes about 45 seconds.
Also
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:54:26AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 02:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>>Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
> >>>lapic would make this much
On 08/26/2010 02:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth
trying.
Didn't try
On 08/26/2010 01:25 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Isn't that only required on SVM?
No, old vmx too.
'flexpriority' in /proc/cpuinfo means tpr patching is unnecessary.
But to use flexpriority you need in-kernel irqchip, so qemu.git will be
slow even if you have it.
--
error compiling committ
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:24:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 26.08.2010, at 11:59, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > On 08/26/10 09:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I ca
On 26.08.2010, at 11:59, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 08/26/10 09:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
lapic would make this much of a difference with wi
On 08/26/10 09:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth
trying.
Didn't try win7, but for winxp it
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
> >lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth
> >trying.
>
> Didn't try win7, but for winxp it is a *huge* difference.
>
Hi,
Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth
trying.
Didn't try win7, but for winxp it is a *huge* difference.
cheers,
Gerd
On 08/25/2010 06:09 PM, walt wrote:
On 08/25/2010 12:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote:
Hi qemu team,
I just discovered that qemu now offers kvm support, so I decided to
compare it to qemu-kvm.
I'm running the latest git versions of both programs on an AMD64
hos
On 08/25/2010 12:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote:
Hi qemu team,
I just discovered that qemu now offers kvm support, so I decided to
compare it to qemu-kvm.
I'm running the latest git versions of both programs on an AMD64
host running the latest kernel from Linu
12 matches
Mail list logo
