On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> 2010/1/16 Blue Swirl :
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> Don't clear interrupts on disa
2010/1/16 Blue Swirl :
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
Don't clear interrupts on disabling, because
* Sun4M_SystemArchitecture_edited2.pdf doesn'
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> wrote:
Don't clear interrupts on disabling, because
* Sun4M_SystemAr
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> Don't clear interrupts on disabling, because
>>> * Sun4M_SystemArchitecture_edited2.pdf doesn't describe
>>> that masking o
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> wrote:
>> Don't clear interrupts on disabling, because
>> * Sun4M_SystemArchitecture_edited2.pdf doesn't describe
>> that masking or un-masking IRQ shall clear pending ones.
>>
>> * Field te
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> Don't clear interrupts on disabling, because
> * Sun4M_SystemArchitecture_edited2.pdf doesn't describe
> that masking or un-masking IRQ shall clear pending ones.
>
> * Field tests also show that SPARCstation-20 doesn't
> clear them.
Aw
