Blue Swirl wrote:
Guest time can be unreliable, it could also indicate that Linux
executes a lot more timer interrupts. Could you retest and measure the
wall clock time?
I think the C flag change should only increase performance. The next
commit may have negative effects because more work is do
On 5/10/10, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks a lot, with this patch my tests passed! I applied the combined
> patch.
> >
>
> Yes, I definitely see an improvement with this patch - at least my Debian
> lenny SPARC boot cd doesn't randomly kernel panic any more. It looks a
Blue Swirl wrote:
Thanks a lot, with this patch my tests passed! I applied the combined patch.
Yes, I definitely see an improvement with this patch - at least my
Debian lenny SPARC boot cd doesn't randomly kernel panic any more. It
looks as if it now just can't find /init which could just be
On 5/8/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 5/5/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Blue Swirl
> wrote:
> >>
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 5/5/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> >> >> On
On 5/5/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Blue Swirl
> wrote:
> >>
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> >> >> Hi
On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> >> Hi!
> >> >>
> >> >> There is an issue with lazy conditio
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> There is an issue with lazy conditional codes evaluation where
>> >> we return from trap
On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> There is an issue with lazy conditional codes evaluation where
> >> we return from trap handler with mismatching conditionals.
> >>
> >> I seldo
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> There is an issue with lazy conditional codes evaluation where
>> we return from trap handler with mismatching conditionals.
>>
>> I seldom reproduce it here when dragging qemu window while
>> m
On 5/3/10, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is an issue with lazy conditional codes evaluation where
> we return from trap handler with mismatching conditionals.
>
> I seldom reproduce it here when dragging qemu window while
> machine is working through silo initialization. I use gentoo m
12 matches
Mail list logo
