On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 23:37 +, Paul Brook wrote:
I can check the hypervisor feature is not present, for emulating PowerPC
620 on a target that would have hypervisor emulation support. But I
cannot do as if the CPU do not have the feature if it's actually
available. The PowerPC 64
Two side comments:
Note that most (all ?) embedded Freescale PowerPC microcontrollers
implement those extensions and that some ones are greatly interrested
with having an usable emulation avaible for those CPUs.
Has anyone started to implement spe ?
- someone provide an open-source
I noticed that some target CPUs macros have been added while they do not
seem necessary. I don't like that because it introduces more #ifdefs
which prevent making a version supporting simultaneously all the CPUs.
In particular I saw the following:
- TARGET_MIPSN32 : it is always combined with
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 19:32 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I noticed that some target CPUs macros have been added while they do not
seem necessary. I don't like that because it introduces more #ifdefs
which prevent making a version supporting simultaneously all the CPUs.
In particular I saw
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 19:32 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I noticed that some target CPUs macros have been added while they do not
seem necessary. I don't like that because it introduces more #ifdefs
which prevent making a version supporting simultaneously all the CPUs.
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:55 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 19:32 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I noticed that some target CPUs macros have been added while they do not
seem necessary. I don't like that because it introduces more #ifdefs
which
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:55 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 19:32 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I noticed that some target CPUs macros have been added while they do not
seem necessary. I don't like that because it introduces more
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 22:47 +, Paul Brook wrote:
Removing the ppc64h target means, for me, removing any option to emulate
the hypervisor feature at any time (if removed) or removing the ability
to use the PowerPC 64 targets the way they are when booting on Apple G5
machines (if merged
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I noticed that some target CPUs macros have been added while they do not
seem necessary. I don't like that because it introduces more #ifdefs
which prevent making a version supporting simultaneously all the CPUs.
In particular I saw the following:
- TARGET_MIPSN32 :
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:55:26PM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Why not adding a new CPU type such as PPC970 with hypervisor and keep
the current PPC970 implementation as it is without the hypervisor mode.
I don't see the problem in replacing the ifdefs with a new CPU model !
You cannot
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:55:26PM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Why not adding a new CPU type such as PPC970 with hypervisor and keep
the current PPC970 implementation as it is without the hypervisor mode.
I don't see the problem in
I can check the hypervisor feature is not present, for emulating PowerPC
620 on a target that would have hypervisor emulation support. But I
cannot do as if the CPU do not have the feature if it's actually
available. The PowerPC 64 target emulates PowerPC 64 without the
hypervisor feature,
12 matches
Mail list logo
