Am 04.12.2014 um 20:44 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
On 12/04/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
@device is a sub-optimal name for this single parameter. Either we
accept that and move on, or we deprecate it in favor of a new parameter
with a better name. I guess the better name
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 12/04/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
@device is a sub-optimal name for this single parameter. Either we
accept that and move on, or we deprecate it in favor of a new parameter
with a better name. I guess the better name isn't worth that
Am 05.12.2014 um 10:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 12/04/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
@device is a sub-optimal name for this single parameter. Either we
accept that and move on, or we deprecate it in favor of a new parameter
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 05.12.2014 um 10:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 12/04/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
@device is a sub-optimal name for this single parameter. Either we
accept that and move on, or we
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 04.12.2014 um 20:44 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
On 12/04/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
@device is a sub-optimal name for this single parameter. Either we
accept that and move on, or we deprecate it in favor of a new parameter
with a
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
[ CCed Benoît and Max, this is blockdev work ]
[ CCed Jeff, we're also talking about op blockers ]
Not stripping quoted text for their convenience.
Am 02.12.2014 um 20:06 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
= Introduction =
The block layer and its
Fam Zheng f...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 12/02 20:06, Markus Armbruster wrote:
== block-core.json ==
* block-commit
@device names a backend, @top and @base each name one of its nodes via
file name matching.
TODO: support specifying the two nodes via node name.
Why do we
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 12/03/2014 03:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[ CCed Benoît and Max, this is blockdev work ]
[ CCed Jeff, we're also talking about op blockers ]
Not stripping quoted text for their convenience.
I still intend
On 12/04/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
@device is a sub-optimal name for this single parameter. Either we
accept that and move on, or we deprecate it in favor of a new parameter
with a better name. I guess the better name isn't worth that much
trouble, in particular since the
[ CCed Benoît and Max, this is blockdev work ]
[ CCed Jeff, we're also talking about op blockers ]
Not stripping quoted text for their convenience.
Am 02.12.2014 um 20:06 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
= Introduction =
The block layer and its monitor commands have evolved, resulting in a
On 03/12/2014 06:52, Fam Zheng wrote:
* drive-backup
@device names a backend.
Do we want to be able to back up any node, or only a backend?
If non-backend nodes are read-only, we can just copy them outside QEMU.
Note: documentation of @target sounds like it could somehow
On 12/03/2014 03:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[ CCed Benoît and Max, this is blockdev work ]
[ CCed Jeff, we're also talking about op blockers ]
Not stripping quoted text for their convenience.
I still intend to go through this mail in more detail, but off of a
quick glance, I see you missed a
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 12/03/2014 03:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[ CCed Benoît and Max, this is blockdev work ]
[ CCed Jeff, we're also talking about op blockers ]
Not stripping quoted text for their convenience.
I still intend to go through this mail in more detail, but off
= Introduction =
The block layer and its monitor commands have evolved, resulting in a
bit of a mess when it comes to referring to block layer objects in
commands.
Semantically, we refer to two different kinds of objects: backends and
nodes within backends.
Example: eject parameter @device
On Tue, 12/02 20:06, Markus Armbruster wrote:
== block-core.json ==
* block-commit
@device names a backend, @top and @base each name one of its nodes via
file name matching.
TODO: support specifying the two nodes via node name.
Why do we need @device when a top node is
15 matches
Mail list logo